Difficult-to-treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults: Prevalence and burden. Results from the CARMEN-France registry.

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and the burden of difficult-to-treat primary ITP (pITP), defined by the need for another ITP treatment after romiplostim and eltrombopag. Adult patients were selected in the prospective, real-world CARMEN-France registry up to December 2021. Out of 821 adult patients with pITP, 29 had difficult-to-treat ITP (3.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3%-4.8% in total; 7.6%; 95% CI: 4.9%-10.2% of patients needing ≥2nd line treatment). The 3-year cumulative incidence of bleeding, infection and thrombosis was 100%, 24.1% and 13.8% respectively. The median cumulative duration of hospital stays was 31 days (median follow-up: 30.3 months).

Avatrombopag for adults with early versus chronic immune thrombocytopenia.

Avatrombopag is a newer thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) currently approved to treat chronic ITP (duration >12 months). No studies have yet evaluated the safety and effectiveness of avatrombopag in newly diagnosed ITP (duration <3 months) or persistent ITP (duration 3-12 months), and so its use in these populations is presently off-label worldwide. We hypothesize that avatrombopag has similar safety and effectiveness irrespective of ITP disease phase. To evaluate this, we performed a multicenter observational cohort study of adults with ITP treated with avatrombopag, comparing patient outcomes by disease phase (newly diagnosed/persistent versus chronic). Seventy-five patients were included, 23 with newly diagnosed/persistent ITP (17.7 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment) and 52 with chronic ITP (65.3 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment). On avatrombopag, 91% of newly diagnosed/persistent patients versus 96% of chronic patients (p = .58) achieved a platelet response (≥50 × 109 /L) and 86% versus 81% of patients (p = .78) achieved a complete response (≥100 × 109 /L). Median platelet counts on avatrombopag were similar between the two groups (165 × 109 /L vs. 129 × 109 /L, p = .57). Response durability was high and similar in both groups. No patients in the newly diagnosed/persistent group had a major bleeding event, thromboembolic event or avatrombopag discontinuation for adverse events, compared with 4, 1, and 2, respectively, in the chronic group. Thrombocytosis (platelets ≥400 × 109 /L) incidence was similar in the two groups. No other drug-related adverse events occurred in either group. Avatrombopag was safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed and persistent ITP, with outcomes numerically, statistically, and clinically similar to patients receiving avatrombopag for chronic ITP.

Management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: guidance from the ISTH Subcommittee on Hemostasis and Malignancy.

Thrombocytopenia is a common adverse effect of chemotherapy. The development of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is influenced by cancer type and therapy, occurring in approximately one-third of patients with a solid tumor diagnosis and half of all patients with a hematologic malignancy. CIT may complicate the administration of chemotherapy, leading to therapeutic delays or dose reductions. This guidance document, presented by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Subcommittee on Hemostasis and Malignancy, provides a comprehensive summary of the evidence and offers direction on the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in various settings of CIT, including solid tumors, acute myeloid leukemia, stem cell transplant, and lymphoma. Studies have shown that TPO-RAs can improve platelet counts in CIT, but the clinical benefits of TPO-RA in terms of reducing bleeding, limiting platelet transfusion, avoiding chemotherapy delay, or dose reduction are uncertain. Further research is needed to optimize the selection of appropriate indications and study design to manage thrombocytopenia following chemotherapy.

High- vs regular-dose recombinant human thrombopoietin plus cyclosporine A in patients with newly diagnosed non-severe aplastic anemia: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine A (CsA) and regular doses of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) can accelerate platelet recovery in patients with non-severe aplastic anemia (NSAA). However, it is unclear whether CsA plus rhTPO at a higher dose can further increase the efficacy. METHODS: Data from patients with newly diagnosed NSAA, who had been treated with CsA in combination with different doses of rhTPO between February 2021 and August 2021 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, were reviewed. All the enrolled patients had been treated with CsA at 3-5 mg/(kg/d), and patients were further classified into high-dose (with rhTPO 30000U qd × 14 days for 2 months) group or regular-dose (with rhTPO 15000U qd × 7days for 3 months) group. The treatment response and therapy-related adverse events were compared. RESULTS: 36 patients including 16 (44.4%) in the high-dose and 20 (55.6%) in the regular-dose group were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were compatible between the two groups. The platelet counts were significantly higher at 1/3/6 months in the high-dose group (p = 0.028, 0.0063 and p = 0.040, respectively). The high-dose group had a significantly shorter time to platelet transfusion independence ([1 (0.5-6) months vs 2.5 (1-12) months, p = 0.040]). There was no significant difference in overall response and complete response rate between the two groups at 1/3/6/12 months (p > 0.05). Treatment-related morbidities were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adding a higher dose of rhTPO can further accelerate platelet recovery and platelet transfusion independence in patients with newly diagnosed NSAA.

Efficacy and safety of high dose recombinant human thrombopoietin in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia.

The conventional dose of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is 300 U/kg per day, but the clinical reaction rate is not satisfactory. Accordingly, we explored the efficacy and safety of increasing rhTPO dose in the treatment of ITP. A retrospective study was conducted to collect the clinical data of 105 ITP patients who were divided into two groups, a low-dose group (15 000 U/day) and a high-dose group (30 000 U/day) according to the dose of rhTPO. The total effective rate of the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 31/44 (70.45%) vs. 56/61 (91.80%) (P = .049), and the average time of using rhTPO in the high-dose group was shorter than that in the low-dose group (7 days vs. 10 days, P = .001). On the 7th and 14th day of treatment, the efficacy of the high-dose group was better than that of the low-dose group [45/61 (73.77%) vs. 17/44 (38.64%), P < .001; 55/60 (91.67%) vs. 30/44 (68.18%), P < .05)]. The incidence of treatment related adverse events in the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 6/44 (13.64%) vs. 6/61 (9.84%) (P > .05), which were mild and transient in nature. In our study, high-dose rhTPO had good efficacy and high safety in the treatment of ITP with the efficacy better than low-dose rhTPO especially at day 7.

What is the context? Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts due to increased platelet destruction and impaired platelet production.The therapy direction of ITP involves promoting platelet generation, reducing excessive platelet destruction, immune regulation and so on.Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), a promote platelet production drug, has pharmacological action similar to that of endogenous TPO. It can increase platelet count rapidly and effectively and has immunological regulation effect as well.It is found that rhTPO can rapidly and effectively increase platelet count, which has potential clinical application value in emergency situations.What is new? Traditionally, rhTPO has been recommended at 300 U/kg per day. Although it can greatly improve the treatment effect of ITP, the effect is not very satisfactory. In clinical practice, it has been observed that rhTPO dosage is often relatively insufficient and the therapeutic effect is poor. Therefore, we explored the efficacy and safety of increasing rhTPO dose in the treatment of ITP.Within the efficacy and safety of rhTPO 15 000 U/day and 30 000 U/day in the treatment of ITP, our analyses suggest that:The early response rate of the high-dose group was better than that of the low-dose group.In the high-dose group, the effective rate of rhTPO alone or combined with glucocorticoids was more than 90%.Treatment related adverse events occurred at a low rate and remained mild and transient.What is the impact? Comparing with conventional dose rhTPO, high-dose rhTPO may have better efficacy and safety in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia and shorter administration time.

Romiplostim use for thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case series from a single center in Qatar.

Thrombocytopenia is a common and serious complication that can occur following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and it contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms of post-HSCT thrombocytopenia are multifactorial and complex. There are no clear consensus and guidelines for managing thrombocytopenia post-HSCT. Recently, there has been promising use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), particularly eltrombopag and romiplostim, as treatments for post-HSCT thrombocytopenia. Notably, that this indication is considered off-label, and data in this use are limited. Based on the existing body of evidence, romiplostim emerges as a safe and effective option for individuals with transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia after HSCT. In this context, we present a summary of our experience at a single center, where romiplostim was used in the management of post-HSCT thrombocytopenia due to poor graft function. Notably, all four cases responded positively to romiplostim treatment, and no significant adverse events were observed.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

The introduction of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) led to a paradigm shift in the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, TPO-RAs are not approved for use during pregnancy due to the absence of evidence and concerns for possible effects on the fetus due to their expected transplacental transfer. This comprehensive review examines the safety and efficacy of TPO-RA in 45 pregnancies of women with ITP (romiplostim n = 22; eltrombopag n = 21; both in the same pregnancy n = 2). Mothers experienced failure of the median of three treatment lines during pregnancy prior to TPO-RA administration. A platelet response (>30 × 109 /L) was seen in 86.7% of cases (including a complete response >100 × 109 /L in 66.7%) and was similar between eltrombopag and romiplostim (87.0% and 83.3%, p = 0.99). The maternal safety profile was favourable, with no thromboembolic events encountered. Neonatal thrombocytopenia was noted in one third of cases, with one case of ICH grade 3, and neonatal thrombocytosis was observed in three cases. No other neonatal adverse events attributable to TPO-RAs were seen. This review suggests that the use of TPO-RA during pregnancy is associated with a high response rate and appears safe. Nevertheless, TPO-RA should not be routinely used in pregnancy and should be avoided in the first trimester until further evidence is accumulated.

Treatment preferences towards thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for immune thrombocytopenia and experience of disease (TRAPeze): Italy cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Identify patient preference towards thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and determine the clinical and social impact of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Italy. METHODS: The Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonist Patient experience (TRAPeze) survey collected responses from Italian residents from 17th January to 28th February 2022. TRAPeze utilized a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit patient preferences towards TPO-RA attributes and a patient burden survey (PBS) to determine ITP disease characteristics and social impact. RESULTS: Seventy-six respondents completed the DCE, of which 69 completed both the DCE and PBS (mean [range] age 45 [18.0-73.0] years, 80% female). TPO-RA attributes with the greatest influence over respondent choice were method of administration (odds ratio [OR] 2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16-4.06), drug-food interactions (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.17-1.86) and frequency of dosing (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.15-1.52). Respondents were more likely to prefer therapies administered orally over subcutaneous injection (OR 3.76; 95% CI 2.51-5.63), once weekly over once daily (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.26-2.65), and therapies without food restrictions over with restrictions (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.17-2.14).The most frequently reported symptoms were bruising (82%), petechiae (65%) and fatigue (64%). Most respondents (84%) felt ITP impacted familial relationships and 71% of employed respondents reported fatigue influencing their ability to work, with 31% reducing working hours. CONCLUSION: Although responses indicated a moderate perception of general health, ITP clearly impacted respondent work and social life. Our findings demonstrate respondents preferred TPO-RAs delivered orally, with less frequent dosing and without food restrictions.

Safety of romiplostim administered immediately after cord-blood transplantation: a phase 1 trial.

Graft failure and delayed hematopoietic recovery are the major limitations of cord-blood transplantation (CBT). Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, promotes megakaryopoiesis and multilineage hematopoiesis in aplastic anemia. The decreased number of hematopoietic stem cells in the early phase after CBT and aplastic anemia share certain characteristics. Therefore, we hypothesized that romiplostim administration immediately after CBT may promote multilineage hematopoietic recovery. We investigated the safety and preliminary efficacy of administering romiplostim a day after CBT. This phase 1 dose-escalation study included six adults with hematologic malignancies in remission. Romiplostim was administered subcutaneously within 7 days after single-unit CBT, initially at doses of 5 µg/kg or 10 µg/kg in three patients, then once a week for 14 weeks or until platelet recovery. The maximum dose was 20 µg/kg. The median number of romiplostim administrations was 6 (range, 3-15). Romiplostim-related adverse events included bone pain (3/6) and injection site reaction (1/6). Non-hematological grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed in four patients; febrile neutropenia was the most common (4/6). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment and the median time was 14 days (range, 12-32). Platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109 /L were recorded in all patients except for one who died on day 48; the median time was 34 days (range, 29-98). No relapse, thrombosis, or bone marrow fibrosis was observed during a median follow-up of 34 months. Romiplostim may be safely administered in the early phase of CBT. Further phase 2 trial is warranted for its efficacy evaluation. Trial registration number: UMIN000033799, August 18, 2018.

Early initiation of second-line therapy in primary immune thrombocytopenia: insights from real-world evidence.

To compare patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) prescribed early (within 3 months of initial ITP treatment) second-line treatment (eltrombopag, romiplostim, rituximab, immunosuppressive agents, splenectomy) with or without concomitant first-line therapy to those who received only first-line therapy. This real-world retrospective cohort study of 8268 patients with primary ITP from a large US-based database (Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record [EHR] dataset) combined electronic claims and EHR data. Outcomes included platelet count, bleeding events, and corticosteroid exposure 3 to 6 months after initial treatment. Baseline platelet counts were lower in patients receiving early second-line therapy (10‒28 × 109/L) versus those who did not (67 × 109/L). Counts improved and bleeding events decreased from baseline in all treatment groups 3 to 6 months after the start of therapy. Among the very few patients for whom follow-up treatment data were available (n = 94), corticosteroid use was reduced during the 3- to 6-month follow-up period in patients who received early second-line therapy versus those who did not (39% vs 87%, p < 0.001). Early second-line treatment was prescribed for more severe cases of ITP and appeared to be associated with improved platelet counts and bleeding outcomes 3 to 6 months after initial therapy. Early second-line therapy also appeared to reduce corticosteroid use after 3 months, although the small number of patients with follow-up data on treatment precludes any substantive conclusions. Further research is needed to determine whether early second-line therapy has an effect on the long-term course of ITP.

Combining thrombopoietin receptor agonists with immunosuppressive drugs in adult patients with multirefractory immune thrombocytopenia, an update on the French experience.

Combining drugs could be an effective option for treating multirefractory ITP, that is, patients not responding to rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) and splenectomy. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study including multirefractory ITP patients who received a combination of a TPO-RA and an immunosuppressive drug. We included 39 patients (67% women, median age 59 years [range 21-96]), with a median ITP duration of 57 months [3-393] and a median platelet count at initiation of 10 × 109 /L [1-35]. The combination regimen was given for a median duration of 12 months [1-103] and included eltrombopag (51%) or romiplostim (49%), associated with mycophenolate mofetil (54%), azathioprine (36%), cyclophosphamide (5%), cyclosporin (3%) or everolimus (3%). Overall, 30 patients (77%) achieved at least a response (platelet count ≥30 × 109 /L and at least doubling baseline during at least 3 months), including 24 complete responses (platelet count >100 × 109 /L during at least 3 months) with a median time to response of 30 days [7-270] and a median duration of response of 15 months [4-63]. Severe adverse event related to ITP treatment was observed in 31%. In conclusion, this study confirms that some patients with multirefractory ITP can achieve long lasting response with this combination.

Additional efficacy analysis of avatrombopag phase III data for the treatment of adults with immune thrombocytopenia.

Avatrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that was approved in the US in 2019 for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase III study (NCT01438840) of avatrombopag in adult patients with ITP evaluated platelet count response to avatrombopag during the core study in different subgroups, and durability of response data in patients who responded to avatrombopag treatment both during the core phase (total population) and during the core and extension phase (total population and by subgroup). Loss of response (LOR [platelet count <30 × 109/L]) was defined as LOR over two consecutive scheduled visits. The response was generally similar between subgroups though a few differences were observed. The durability of response analysis showed that avatrombopag-treated patients maintained their response for 84.5% of time on treatment during the core phase and 83.3% during the core and extension phase; 55.2% of patients in the core phase and 52.3% in the core and extension phase never experienced LOR. We conclude that the initial response to avatrombopag is both stable and durable.

What is the context? Avatrombopag is a medicine that helps the body produce platelet cells, which are necessary for blood clotting.Avatrombopag is used to treat people with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP); these patients have low numbers of platelet cells in their blood, so their blood may not clot efficiently, putting them at risk of uncontrolled bleeding.A phase III clinical study in patients with chronic ITP showed that platelet counts increased for most patients who were treated with avatrombopag; patients who had a platelet count ≥50 × 10⁹/L were considered to have a response to avatrombopag treatment.The present study analyzes data from a phase III clinical study to determine whether there are any characteristics that make a patient more or less likely to have a loss of response (LOR) while taking avatrombopag, whether the initial response to avatrombopag is stable, and how long the response lasts.For this analysis, LOR is defined as platelet count <30 × 10⁹/L for either four consecutive weeks or for two consecutive office visits while taking avatrombopag.What is new? In general, patient characteristics did not influence the likelihood of LOR.Patients who responded maintained their response for most of the time they were taking avatrombopag.Most patients did not experience LOR.What is the impact? The initial response to avatrombopag is stable and long-lasting in patients with chronic ITP.These findings indicate that patients with a variety of background characteristics can experience a durable platelet response with avatrombopag treatment.

Efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim in Indian patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: A multicentric retrospective study.

Context and Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim in Indian patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Settings and Design: Multicentre, retrospective observational study. Methods and Material: Patients with chronic ITP who received biosimilar romiplostim from July 2019 to March 2020 across 3 major hospitals in Guwahati, India, were included. The study outcomes were the platelet response (platelet count > 50 × 109/L), time to first response, number of dose-limiting events, and the median effective dose. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive. Results: Of 32 patients included in this analysis, majority (59.4%) were females. The mean (SD) age was 40.37 (15.79) years, and mean age at ITP diagnosis was 38.53 years. The median number of romiplostim doses were 27.5 (range: 10-42) over a period of 10 months; median romiplostim dose used was 4.2 µg/kg (range: 2.8-5 µg/kg). Platelet response was achieved as early as after one week in 9 (28.12%) patients, which continued to increase to 24 (75%) patients after the second, 30 (93.75%) patients after the third and all 32 (100%) patients after four weeks of romiplostim administration. The median platelet count was 161 × 109/L. Dose reduction was done in a total of 21 patients. Thrombocytosis (46.88%), elevated liver enzymes (15.63%) and myalgia (15.63%) were the most common adverse events. Conclusions: Biosimilar romiplostim was effective in achieving and maintaining platelet response without any new safety concerns in Indian adult patients with chronic ITP. The median effective dose of romiplostim required in our patients was lower as compared with the standard prescribed dose.

Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) of different dosing regimens for refractory/relapsed primary immune thrombocytopenia: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial and pharmacokinetics study.

Recombinant human TPO (rhTPO) is effective for refractory/relapsed primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but optimal dosing regimen remains elusive. In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, a total of 282 adult ITP patients (mean age 47.3 years; 82 men) with a platelet count ≤30 × 109/L or >30 × 109/L with active bleeding randomly received a once daily (QD) subcutaneous injection of 7500 U (n = 64) or 15000 U rhTPO for 14 injections, or 15000 U or 30000 U rhTPO once every other day (QOD) for 7 injections. The primary outcomes included change from baseline in platelet count and total response rate (TRR) on day 14. On day 14, the median increase of platelet count from baseline was the highest in the 15000-U QD group (167.5 × 109/L, interquartile range [IQR] 23.0-295.0 × 109/L), followed by the 30000-U QOD group (57.5 × 109/L, IQR 9.0-190.0 × 109/L) (ANCOVA P < .001; P = .266 with baseline count as a covariate). The TRR on day 14 was also the highest in the 15000-U QD group (63.2%), followed by the 30000-U QOD group (59.7%). The rate of grade 3 and above adverse events did not differ among the four groups. There were no new safety concerns. All 4 regimens are safe and well-tolerated. The 30000-U QOD regimen is practically indistinguishable in efficacy to the 15000-U QD regimen.

What is the context? Relative thrombopoietin deficiency is implicated in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), which is characterized by increased platelet destruction and impaired megakaryopoiesis.Patients who are innately unresponsive to or have relapsed after glucocorticoid treatment have limited treatment options.Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) improves treatment response of primary ITP patients when added to high-dose dexamethasone.What is new? This trial sought to identify an optimal dosing regimen of rhTPO for patients who had failed or relapsed after glucocorticoid therapy.Of the 4 regimens, once daily 15000 U rhTPO for 14 injections yielded the greatest median increase in platelet count (167.5 × 10⁹/L) from baseline and attained the highest total response rate on day 14 (63.2%).30000 U rhTPO once every other day for 7 injections was effective in rapidly increasing platelet counts in the first 7 days.All 4 regimens were safe and well-tolerated.What is the impact? The 30000 U rhTPO once every other day regimen may offer an effective and safe regimen with less frequent injections, but future trials with longer follow-up are needed.

Efficacy and Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of eltrombopag, romiplostim, avatrombopag, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), and hetrombopag for adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the five therapies from inception to June 1, 2022, were included. The efficacy outcome was the rate of platelet response, defined as the achievement of platelet counts above 50 × 109/L. Pairwise odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was used to rank the included therapies for each outcome. RESULTS: In total, 1,360 participants were analyzed in 14 eligible RCTs. All of the therapies showed a significantly better platelet response than the placebo, and avatrombopag (OR, 7.42; 95% CI: 1.74-31.69) and rhTPO (OR, 3.86; 95% CI: 1.62-9.18) were better than eltrombopag. Regarding TRAEs, no significant differences were found between patients receiving eltrombopag, romiplostim, and avatrombopag. Avatrombopag carried the highest platelet response rate with SUCRA value of 87.5, and carried the least TRAEs risk with SUCRA value of 37.0. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that avatrombopag appeared to be the optimal choice as the second-line therapy for adult ITP.

Evaluating the impact of thrombopoietin receptor agonist medications on patient outcomes and quality of life in paediatric immune thrombocytopenia through semi-structured interviews.

Over the last decade, treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in children has advanced to include thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) medications. Concurrently, there has been an increased emphasis on patient-reported outcomes-especially quality of life-to guide treatment. Assessing the impact of TPO-RAs on quality of life in paediatric ITP is therefore a priority. In this single-centre integrative mixed-methods study, a cohort of children with ITP prescribed a TPO-RA was identified. These children and/or their caregivers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews focussed on quality-of-life measures. Independently, a retrospective chart review collected ITP-related data (platelet count, bleeding events) and TPO-RA data (dosing, side effects). Among the 23 eligible patients, 20 were represented in interviews. On chart review, 11/20 patients responded to TPO-RA by meeting platelet count criteria of ≥50 × 109 /L for six or more weeks in the absence of rescue therapy. In interviews with these children and/or their parents, 19/20 expressed the TPO-RA had 'worked', with 11/20 reporting benefit to mood and 11/20 reporting increased participation in activities/sports. Concerns were raised in interviews about TPO-RA medication cost (17/20), medication administration (10/20) and potential side effects (10/20). In conclusion, this study suggests that TPO-RA use in children with ITP improves quality of life.

A single-arm, long-term efficacy and safety study of subcutaneous romiplostim in children with immune thrombocytopenia.

Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist approved for children and adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) for ≥6 months, recommended as second-line treatment. This phase 3b, single-arm, multicenter study investigated long-term efficacy and safety of romiplostim in children ≥1 to <18 years old with ≥6 months' ITP duration and platelet counts ≤30 × 109/L. Children received weekly subcutaneous romiplostim (1 µg/kg titrated to 10 µg/kg) to maintain platelets within 50 to 200 × 109/L. A subset underwent bone marrow examinations. The primary end point was percentage of time with platelet response during the first 6 months' treatment (counts ≥50 × 109/L without rescue medication within the preceding 4 weeks). Overall, 203 patients (median age, 10.0 years) received ≥1 dose of romiplostim, median treatment duration was ∼3 years, and median average weekly dose was 6.9 µg/kg. Ninety-five (46.8%) discontinued (lack of efficacy, n = 43 [21.2%]). Platelet responses were achieved a median (interquartile range) of 50.0% (16.7%-83.3%) of the time during the first 6 months, increasing to 78.2% (26.7%-90.4%) during the overall 36-month treatment period. Eleven patients (5.4%) achieved sustained responses (consecutive counts ≥50 × 109/L without ITP medications for ≥24 weeks). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 56 patients (27.6%), with 8 (3.9%) experiencing serious treatment-related AEs; all of these led to discontinuation, including 4 cases of neutralizing antibodies (romiplostim, n = 3; TPO, n = 1). Bleeding occurred in 141 patients (69.5%), decreasing over time; grade ≥3 bleeding events occurred in 20 (9.9%). At year 2, eight of 63 evaluable patients (12.7%) had grade 2 reticulin. Long-term romiplostim resulted in sustained on-treatment platelet responses with an overall safety profile consistent with previous studies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02279173.